Compare engines
LTX Video 2.0 Pro vs LTX 2.3 Pro
This page compares LTX Video 2.0 Pro vs LTX 2.3 Pro on MaxVideoAI using the same prompts, side-by-side renders, key specs, and a scorecard across 11 criteria. Use it to shortlist the best fit — then open each engine profile for full specs and prompt examples.
LTX 2.3 Pro
Strengths: Controllability, Visual Quality
Scorecard (Side-by-Side)
Scores reflect quality and control on MaxVideoAI across 11 criteria.
Prompt Adherence
iprompt alignment / instruction followingVisual Quality
iimage quality / aesthetic quality / realism / artifacts / flickerMotion Realism
imotion smoothness / physics plausibilityTemporal Consistency
itemporal coherence / identity consistencyHuman Fidelity
ifaces / hands / body realismText & UI Legibility
itext rendering / readabilityAudio & Lip Sync
ilip sync quality / dialogue syncMulti-Shot Sequencing
ishot-to-shot continuity / multi-shotControllability
icamera control / constraint followingSpeed & Stability
ilatency / success ratePricing
iprice per second / credits / estimated costWinner summary
LTX 2.3 Pro leads on 10/11 (best: Controllability, Visual Quality).
Video-to-Video: LTX 2.3 Pro (Not supported vs Supported (extend / retake workflows)).
Key Specs (Side-by-Side)
Compare key AI video model specs side-by-side (pricing, inputs, resolution, duration, aspect ratios, audio, and core controls). This is a high-level snapshot — see the full engine profile for the complete feature set and prompt examples.
Showdown (same prompt)
Side-by-side renders from the same prompt on MaxVideoAI. Prompts are identical; outputs may vary by model.
Showing up to 3 prompt pairs for clarity.
Fast Motion + Physics (16:9)
What it tests: Motion Realism + Temporal Consistency + Visual Quality
Source prompts stay in English to keep the same test across engines.
LTX Video 2.0 Pro
LTX 2.3 Pro
UGC Talking Head + Lip Sync (9:16)
What it tests: Human Fidelity + Audio/Lip Sync + Prompt Adherence
Source prompts stay in English to keep the same test across engines.
LTX Video 2.0 Pro
LTX 2.3 Pro
Hands + Product Demo + On-screen Text
What it tests: Hands/Fingers + Text & UI Legibility + Prompt Adherence
Source prompts stay in English to keep the same test across engines.
LTX Video 2.0 Pro
LTX 2.3 Pro
This side-by-side AI video comparison uses identical prompts to highlight differences in motion, realism, human fidelity, and text legibility. For full specs, controls, and more prompt examples, open each engine profile.
FAQ
Quick answers about LTX Video 2.0 Pro vs LTX 2.3 Pro on MaxVideoAI (pricing, modes, specs, and why results differ).
What are LTX Video 2.0 Pro and LTX 2.3 Pro?
LTX Video 2.0 Pro and LTX 2.3 Pro are AI video generation engines available on MaxVideoAI. This page compares them side-by-side using the same prompts, key specs, and performance data shown above.
Which is better: LTX Video 2.0 Pro or LTX 2.3 Pro?
It depends on your workflow. Use the scorecard and the “same prompt” showdowns to compare prompt adherence, motion realism, human fidelity, and text legibility — then open each engine profile for full details.
Which is cheaper on MaxVideoAI?
Pricing varies by engine and settings (duration, resolution, audio). Currently, LTX Video 2.0 Pro starts at 1080p: $0.07/s and LTX 2.3 Pro starts at 1080p: $0.07/s (see “Pricing (MaxVideoAI)” for details).
What are the biggest differences between LTX Video 2.0 Pro and LTX 2.3 Pro?
- First/Last frame: LTX Video 2.0 Pro is not supported vs LTX 2.3 Pro is supported (start + end image in I2V).
- Max resolution: LTX Video 2.0 Pro is 4K vs LTX 2.3 Pro is 4K on T2V/I2V generate; workflow-specific limits for Audio/Extend/Retake.
Do they support Text-to-Video / Image-to-Video / Video-to-Video?
On MaxVideoAI: Text-to-Video is Supported vs Supported; Image-to-Video is Supported vs Supported; Video-to-Video is Not supported vs Supported (extend / retake workflows). Some fields may still be under validation.
Do they support First/Last frame or references?
First/Last frame is Not supported vs Supported (start + end image in I2V). Reference image/style is Supported vs Supported (single start image; no separate style-reference stack); Reference video is Not supported vs Supported (source clip for extend / retake).
What are the max resolution, duration, and aspect ratios?
Max output is 4K / 10s for LTX Video 2.0 Pro and 4K on T2V/I2V generate; workflow-specific limits for Audio/Extend/Retake / Generate 6–10s; Audio/Extend/Retake up to 20s for LTX 2.3 Pro. Supported aspect ratios include 16:9 vs 16:9 generate / 9:16 generate (see Key Specs for the full list).
Do they support audio generation and lip sync?
Audio output is Supported vs Supported. Native audio generation is Supported vs Supported, and lip sync is Supported vs Supported (some fields may still be under validation).
Does MaxVideoAI add a watermark?
No. MaxVideoAI exports are watermark-free (“Watermark: No (MaxVideoAI)”).
Why do results look different with the same prompt?
Even with identical prompts, models interpret instructions differently and use different training data and generation strategies. That’s why the Showdown section exists: same prompt, side-by-side outputs.
Where can I find full specs, controls, and more prompt examples?
Open the full engine profiles for complete specs, controls, and more prompts: /models/ltx-2 and /models/ltx-2-3-pro. You can also browse more outputs in the engine galleries.